Global warming is killing TREES: Increasing levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere are making them grow faster and die younger, study finds
- A ‘trade-off’ causes quick growth of trees globally but shortens their lifespans
- Researchers say fast tree growth is fuelled by excessive CO2 in the atmosphere
- It’s been said trees could help store excess of CO2 generated by human activity
- But fast growth causes early death and release of CO2 back into the atmosphere
Trees with faster growth rates die younger across multiple countries and species, which reduces their overall carbon storage capacity, a new study claims.
Researchers analysed tree-ring data of more than 200,000 records of 110 species across Europe, Asia and the Americas.
They found faster tree growth, indicated by tree rings, is causing earlier mortality and the release of the carbon back into the atmosphere.
Many scientists believe planting more trees will offset the amount of carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from human activity.
But shorter lifespans of trees will actually make them grow faster and have less time to absorb atmospheric CO2 than anticipated, the new study claims.
The new study further calls into question predictions that greater tree growth means greater carbon storage in forests in the long term.
Nothofagus pumilio (southern beeches) forests around Lago Argentino, in the Andes of southern Patagonia, Argentina, showing groups of dead trees. The global analysis reveals that across almost all tree species, fast growing trees have shorter lifespans
An increase in CO2 in the atmosphere – a key ingredient for photosynthesis – can trigger growth spurts for tree species, but too much can have negative consequences.
‘While it has been known for a long time that fast-growing trees live shorter, so far this was only shown for a few species and at a few sites,’ said study author Dr Roel Brienen from the University of Leeds.
‘We started a global analysis and were surprised to find that these trade-offs are incredibly common.
‘It occurred in almost all species we looked at, including tropical trees.’
Currently, forests absorb large amounts of CO2 from the atmosphere, stimulating tree growth.
A relationship between faster tree growth rates and shorter tree lifespan has already been shown in some trees, particularly in cold-adapted conifers.
But whether this applies across species and climates has been disputed.
Tree rings of Hymenaea courbaril (Leguminosae) from the Neotropics. These tree rings formed during the wet season are delimited by visually distinct bands known as marginal parenchyma bands (limits indicated by the white arrows)
Dr Brienen and colleagues analysed a large dataset of tree-ring data representing tree species across all continents except Africa and Antarctica.
The team looked at tree longevity and growth for a total of 110 species, but only for 82 species could they perform a detailed analysis of growth-longevity trade-offs.
Tress can be aged by measuring their girth – specifically the rings that develop over time that increase that girth.
Faster growth, they report, is linked to reduced tree lifespan both across and within tree species.
The team have theories as to why fast growth leads to earlier mortality.
One is that trees die when they reach a certain critical size – a potential maximum size for a given species in a given habitat – and as fast growing trees reach that size quicker they die at a younger age.
‘Mortality may increase for big trees as they are more likely to break during storms, be hit by lightning or to die during drought,’ Dr Brienen told MailOnline.
Fast-growing trees are more vulnerable to droughts because they make more vulnerable water transport systems.
‘In simple terms they did a lousy job at plumbing,’ Dr Brienen said.
‘Other theories involve trade-offs for trees between investment in growth versus investment in for example strong wood, or defences against pathogens or insect attacks.’
The trade-off of fast growth rates and slow lifespans has the potential to slow down or even reverse the global forest carbon sink in the future, Dr Brienen and his team believe.
Growth-lifespan trade-offs are also near universal, occurring across almost all tree species and climates.
Previous research has shown long-term increases in tree mortality rates lagging behind tree growth increases in the Amazon forest (pictured)
This suggests that increases in forest carbon stocks – carbon sequestered from the atmosphere and stored within the forest ecosystem in living biomass, soil and dead wood – may be short lived.
A reduced future forest carbon sink, which will increase CO2 in the atmosphere in the near future, further increases the urgency to curb greenhouse emissions.
‘Our modelling results suggest there is likely to be a time lag before we see the worst of the potential loss of carbon stocks from increases in tree mortality,’ said Dr Brienen.
‘They estimate that global increases in tree death don’t kick in until after sites show accelerated growth.’
‘This is consistent with observations of increased tree death trends across the globe.’
Previous research at the University of Leeds has found long-term increases in tree mortality rates are lagging behind tree growth increases in the Amazon forest.
In other words, trees are dying before they’re big enough to store significant amounts of carbon from the atmosphere.
And the chances of trees dying increase dramatically as they reach their maximum potential tree size.
‘Our findings, very much like the story of the tortoise and the hare, indicate that there are traits within the fastest growing trees that make them vulnerable, whereas slower growing trees have traits that allow them to persist,’ said study author Dr Steve Voelker from the Department of Environmental and Forest Biology, New York.
‘Our society has benefited in recent decades from the ability of forests to increasingly store carbon and reduce the rate at which CO2 has accumulated in our atmosphere.
‘However, carbon uptake rates of forests are likely to be on the wane as slow-growing and persistent trees are supplanted by fast-growing but vulnerable trees.’
According to David Lee, a professor of atmospheric science at Manchester Metropolitan University, who was not involved with the study, the idea that fossil-fuel based emissions can be offset by planting trees ‘does not stand up to scientific scrutiny’.
‘Detailed and careful studies such as this one are vital in determining the viability of future carbon sinks or negative emissions technologies to keep temperatures with 1.5 degrees Celsius [2.7 degrees Fahrenheit] by the end of the century.’
According to a statement from the UN in December, we are nowhere near on track to meet the this target, as stipulated in the Paris Agreement in 2015.
The study has been published in Nature Communications.
WHAT IS THE PARIS AGREEMENT?
The Paris Agreement, which was first signed in 2015, is an international agreement to control and limit climate change.
It hopes to hold the increase in the global average temperature to below 2°C (3.6ºF) ‘and to pursue efforts to limit the temperature increase to 1.5°C (2.7°F)’.
It seems the more ambitious goal of restricting global warming to 1.5°C (2.7°F) may be more important than ever, according to previous research which claims 25 per cent of the world could see a significant increase in drier conditions.
In June 2017, President Trump announced his intention for the US, the second largest producer of greenhouse gases in the world, to withdraw from the agreement.
The Paris Agreement on Climate Change has four main goals with regards to reducing emissions:
1) A long-term goal of keeping the increase in global average temperature to well below 2°C above pre-industrial levels
2) To aim to limit the increase to 1.5°C, since this would significantly reduce risks and the impacts of climate change
3) Goverments agreed on the need for global emissions to peak as soon as possible, recognising that this will take longer for developing countries
4) To undertake rapid reductions thereafter in accordance with the best available science